Assessment entry point

Use the right assessment depth for the claim in front of you.

Clarity starts at the claim level. The practical question is not only what to do next, but what is currently justified, who owns the consequences, and what would force adaptation.

The interactive quick assessment and the downloadable template now use the same framework fields: claim, posture, evidence, assumptions, confidence, correctability, ownership, monitoring, triggers, and reassessment.

Quick Assessment

Best for one non-trivial claim that needs a fast but disciplined review.

Use when you need current justification, one owner, one monitoring model, and a clear next move.

Open interactive quick assessment →

Downloadable Template

Best when you want a reusable artifact for workshops, documents, or internal process.

It mirrors the same quick-assessment structure without forcing a browser workflow.

Open template page →

Full Assessment

Best when a live commitment has broader consequence, weaker correctability, or more complex monitoring.

Use when you need stronger ownership, richer trigger design, and clearer reassessment governance.

Open assessment method →

Canonical quick-assessment fields

Claim What are we acting as if true?

Posture Discovery, Commitment, or Reassessment?

Evidence What currently supports the claim?

Assumptions What must remain true?

Confidence How strong is the current justification?

Correctability How expensive is being wrong?

Owner Who owns the consequences?

Monitoring Signal What are we watching?

Threshold What condition matters?

Trigger Claim Why does that threshold mean something?

Immediate Response What happens if risk materializes now?

Reassessment What sends the claim back into review?

When to stay quick

One claim, one owner, one signal, one practical recommendation.

When to go deeper

Multiple linked claims, low correctability, or live commitments that need stronger trigger governance.

What not to do

Do not begin with categories or outputs. Start with the claim and let the recommendation follow from the reasoning chain.